Prediction of Corentin Denolly [272nd] vs Evan Furness [879th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L L W L
Form
L W W L L W L L L LHead-To-Head: Denolly 3 - 2 Furness
They have played 12 sets in total, with Denolly winning 7 and Furness winning 5. The last match between Denolly and Furness was at the M25 Villeneuve-Loubet, 13-06-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Corentin Denolly | 3 |
| Evan Furness | 2 |
| Denolly | Stats | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (10-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 272 | Ranking | 879 |
| 269 | Highest Rank | 197 |
| 27 | Age | 26 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 9 |
| 63% (412-244) | Career Total W/L | 58% (291-210) |
| $56,935 | Career Prize Money | $5,730 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Corentin Denolly
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
77 of
127)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
59 of
127)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Corentin Denolly
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Evan Furness
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Evan Furness
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 5-7 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Corentin Denolly
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 60 | Games Won | 56 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:44:13 | Average Match Time | 1:44:13 |
| 63% (247/389) | 1st Serve % | 60% (234/388) |
| 67% (166/247) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (151/234) |
| 51% (73/142) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (79/154) |
| 40% (17/42) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (15/42) |
| 41% (158/388) | Return Points Win % | 39% (150/389) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Corentin Denolly vs Evan Furness Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Denolly 3 - 2 Furness
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Denolly has won 44.56% of points on their second serve, while Furness has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Denolly, in recent form, has won 46.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Furness has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.36% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Denolly has saved 50.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Furness has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Denolly has won 64.94% of matches played (W/L 50/ 27), with Furness winning 29.41% (W/L 5/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Denolly has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 293/ 149), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 53/ 43). Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Denolly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 82.05% of matches (W/L 32/ 7), where as Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 3/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Denolly winning 3 times and Furness being victorious 2 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Denolly winning 7 and Furness winning 5. The last match between Denolly and Furness was at the M25 Villeneuve-Loubet, 13-06-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Denolly and Furness have played a deciding set 2 times, with Denolly winning 1 times and Furness 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Denolly winning 1, and Furness 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Denolly has played against opponents with an average rank of 206.97 while Furness has played against players with an average rank of 240.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Denolly has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Furness has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Denolly has converted 28.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Furness has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Evan Furness
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Evan Furness
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
114)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
114)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Evan Furness
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
57 of
72)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
77 of
127)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
59 of
127)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Dan Added
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Oscar Lacides
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Evan Furness
42%
(
38 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Denolly vs Furness?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Denolly Vs Furness is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (412/244) | Win/Loss | 58% (291/210) |
| 60% (899/597) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (642/487) |
| 54% (7517/6429) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5556/4949) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1995 | Aces Total | 1171 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1880 | Total Double Faults | 1458 |
| 1:26:42 | Average Match Time | 1:25:48 |
| 259.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 264.59 |
| 65% (26358/40557) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18886/30648) |
| 67% (17769/26358) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12685/18886) |
| 49% (6917/14200) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5759/11763) |
| 45% (2077/4609) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1462/3221) |
| 43% (17548/41198) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12589/30274) |
| 63% (409/647) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (285/485) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 56% (101/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (69/134) |
| 60% (114/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (75/139) |
| 90% (397/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (286/248) |
| 10% (397/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (286/37) |
| 21% (259/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (215/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
